Category Archives: Federal Politics

Hillary Clinton Should Be President. I’m With Her

There is every reason why Donald J. Trump should not be President of the United States and myriad reasons why Hillary Clinton should be.  Secretary Clinton’s dedication to America and her professionalism are too strong to allow her to get down into the mud with Mr. Trump and mudsling with him to try to prove to naysayers that she is trustworthy and infinitely more qualified than he is to be president.

Besides, she does not have to do that because she has proven time-and-time-again to those who questioned her trustworthiness but still gave her a fair chance that she has true grit, that she can be trusted, and that she will deliver on her promises to them.  Her track record supports this!  She has proven over decades that she is a hardworking and dedicated woman who means what she says and says what she means.  Like all of us, Hillary Clinton is not perfect.  She has flaws.

She has many scars and is hardened by (political) battle but those scars and her public battle hardened persona are a result of years of fighting for what is right; fighting to make America even greater than it already is.  That persona has nothing to do with the lack of trustworthiness and everything to do with being a politician – and let’s tell it like it is, especially a female politician who has been swimming with sharks for years.  That persona does not make void her impeccable qualifications and render her untrustworthy.  She deserves to be president!  She deserves to become the first female to occupy the Oval Office and hold the title of Commander-in-Chief!

Most of the turmoil that has generated the outcries about how incompetent and untrustworthy she is has been instigated by many of the same people who spent millions of taxpayer dollars on investigating what happened in Benghazi in hopes of finding a smoking gun that would damage Secretary Clinton.  When that did not work because someone in their Party – House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy – committed a gaffe that pulled back the curtain and revealed the real reason behind the Benghazi Select Committee, they finalized their findings shortly after this gaffe.  But they are currently spending millions more taxpayer dollars investigating the so called Clinton emails scandal still in search of a smoking gun that will damage Secretary Clinton and derail her run for president.  The real reason behind this investigation is the same as the one that was behind the Benghazi investigation.  Eventually, the curtain will be pulled back on that investigation as well and the real reason for it will be revealed.

Even with Donald Trump as their standard bearer, a man that they loathe and are still trying to somehow remove and replace in a way that they can spin as fair, they refuse to publicly admit that he is far less qualified than Secretary Clinton is to lead America.  They are so blinded by their ambition and desire to unify their party that they are willing to risk shortchanging America and possibly destroying the Republican Party.  Even though in the recent past some of them have publicly said that he is unqualified and unfit to lead the country, because of partisanship and to maintain party unity they continue to attack secretary Clinton in an effort to put Mr. Trump in the White House.

Secretary Clinton is a tough and dedicated woman whom America should admire and whose love of country and dedicated service to America is beyond reproach.  Although I am fairly sure that she would dismiss it with the wave of a hand as unnecessary sympathy because she is just doing her job, sometimes when I look at that involuntary weariness expressed on the face of that worn and scarred public persona, knowing that there is a real person underneath; that of a wife, a mother, a grandmother and a daughter, I can’t help but to feel sympathy for her.

Perhaps it is better put to say that I empathize with a hardworking, dedicated public servant who is doing everything that she can to serve her country despite those things that she is forced to deal with as a result of American politics yet obliged to deal with in order to provide that service, which she has sometimes labeled as and verbalized as ‘her privilege’ to serve.  Maybe put this way she will not be compelled to dismiss it with the wave of a hand.  She may be tough but after all, she is human.  I’m with her.  I will vote for her and I hope that she wins in November.  Vaya bein, Secretary Clinton.

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line

Shelby County v. Holder; A Supreme Court Decision

With all of the hoopla surrounding the 2016 election I could not help but to reflect on the decision that Chief Justice John Roberts made in 2013 when he elected to side with four other justices to gut the Voting Rights Act.  According to an article in the New York Times Magazine by Jim Ruttenberg dated July 29, 2015 entitled ‘A Dream Undone’, Chief justice John Roberts “declared that the Voting Rights Act had done its job, and it was time to move on.”  Move on to what; all of the bills and laws seeking to obstruct or block legitimate voters’ from voting who have the right to vote?  Laws, some of which were put into place on the same day that the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act and many of which are now being struck down by courts throughout the country.

Many Republicans expressed strong support of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell when he refused to hold hearings to confirm or reject President Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, to the Supreme Court to replace Justice Antonin Scalia.  This nominee is well respected by Democrats and Republicans and has an outstanding resume, which delineates his qualifications to become a Supreme Court Justice.  Nonetheless, most Republican senators have refused to even meet with him because they are holding out hope that a Republican will win the 2016 general election and they can get a bona fide conservative nominee that will be nominated by a Republican president.  The confirmation hearing for Judge Garland has yet to take place.

Republicans now have their nominee and he has promised that he will nominate a conservative to replace Justice Scalia and said that any future nominees during his tenure will also be conservatives.  But there is a problem.  Their nominee is Donald J. Trump and establishment Republicans loathe him.  They and most political pundits laughed when he announced that he would run for president and said that he would drop out early in the race especially with the quality of candidates that he would be pitted against.

When Mr. Trump dispatched a number of those candidates early on and continued to whittle them down during the primaries, establishment Republicans threw up roadblocks that they thought he would be unable to negotiate.  It failed.  As he continued to knock off their stable of top-flight, highly touted candidates, they tried to find a way to prevent him from getting enough delegates to win the nomination outright.  That failed too.  Now that Donald Trump is the official nominee, with each passing day, he is driving them ever closer to the edge of insanity; and now they are rhetorically asking the question, what if he withdraws from the race?  Ha!  I’m sure that that is going to happen.  After all, that would make him his own poster child of losers.

I can see why Republicans would want to assure that they retain a conservative-leaning Supreme Court if that court will continue to make decisions like Citizens United and Shelby County v Holder.  Republicans say that they are an inclusive party that wants to build a bigger and more inclusive tent that exemplifies the so called fact that they want to represent all of the people.  We have already witnessed how determined and sincere they are about building that tent; they gave up on it before they ever really got started.  The matter is now exacerbated by the fact that their 2016 standard bearer has pulled back the curtain and revealed the kind of party that they really are.

This does not by any means mean that all Republicans share the same kind of racist and divisive views that their nominee spouts on a regular basis.  But by remaining quiet when he does these things and refusing to withdraw their endorsements of him raises eyebrows and one certainly cannot be faulted for believing that they are, at the very least, tacitly in agreement with him and therefore complicit in what he is doing.

It does not matter if they are doing this only for the sake of party unity and to assure that a Republican occupies the White House as president come January 2017.  And it does not matter if they are doing it because they believe that the only way that they can assure that Republicans can maintain a conservative Supreme Court is through party unity at all costs.

There is no valid argument that can justify winking at the things that Donald Trump has said and done.  Frankly speaking, one could argue that such behavior is just as bad as actually harboring the same feelings as Mr. Trump and it is just as destructive to America because it depicts a false picture of who we really are as Americans.  And tacitly agreeing with his racist and divisive views for what one might even consider the noblest of reasons is dangerous and will have the same cancerous effect, it will rot America from within until it is arrested and, hopefully, ultimately eradicated.

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line

Do Paul Ryan and Those Republicans Who Support Trump Still Have Their Dignity?

If anyone were to ever ask me about Republicans who support Donald Trump for president I would answer by starting with Speaker Paul Ryan.  I would start with him because he is the number one Republican elected official and because he is (was?) a rising star in the Republican Party.  I can’t recall whether or not it was before or after he endorsed Donald Trump but he said that Secretary Clinton was so irresponsible that she should not be allowed to receive classified security briefings.   And Speaker Ryan believes that Donald Trump is responsible and should receive these briefings?  Based on the following quote from Speaker Ryan, that must be the case.

According to an article in Real Clear Politics posted by Ian Schwartz on July 6, 2016 Speaker Ryan said “…But I don’t think she should get classified information, and I think the [Director of National Intelligence] DNI should block it given how recklessly she handled this from the start.  It is Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump.  Yes, Donald Trump is far better to be commander-in-chief than Hillary Clinton in my mind.”

Back on May 25, 2016, Josh Barro wrote an article about Speaker Paul Ryan in Business Insider entitled ‘All Paul Ryan has left is his dignity, and he must not let Donald Trump steal it.’ In that article, Mr. Barro said:

“Ryan cannot do anything about the fact that Trump has ruined his plan to work with a Republican president to dramatically reshape how the government taxes and spends.  Ryan’s grand plans for 2017 are in ruins, whether he endorses Trump or not, and whether Trump wins or loses.”

“That means the only thing of value Ryan has left is his dignity – and it would be quite irrational for him to allow it to be taken from him.”

Well Mr. Barro, welcome to Trump world, the irrational world that Mr. Trump – against all odds – has somehow managed to create; or better put, to conjure up.  A short time before the writing of this article, Speaker Ryan endorsed Donald Trump.  Based on your tool of measurement, Speaker Ryan no longer has his dignity.  And based on his silence about the totally unacceptable things that Mr. Trump has said since he endorsed him and his refusal to withdraw that endorsement, he has sealed that loss of dignity.  Only time will tell if he will ever be able to regain it.

All of the other Republicans who have thrown their support behind Donald Trump have also lost their dignity.  They put love of the Republican Party and political career above doing what is right and even the retention of their dignity.  It is unlikely that any of those politicians who have endorsed Mr. Trump would publicly admit that they did so for party and/or career purposes.  But when they are in the privacy of their own homes and look at themselves in the mirror I believe that they can’t help but to recoil in shame and feel the pain.  They hurt for themselves, they hurt for their children and grandchildren, and they hurt for the American people.  In the privacy of their own homes they feel the pain because political spin does not work there; it cannot fool the man in the mirror.

There is no doubt that the choices they are faced with and must make are hard ones, but those choices come with the territory.  We elected them to make those tough choices.  Just recently, Donald Trump said some harsh things about two Gold Star family parents, Khizr and Ghazala Khan, one of whom spoke at the Democratic National Convention.  What that parent said about Mr. Trump was unflattering and most people, just like Donald Trump, would likely have retaliated with angry rhetoric whether or not what that person said was true.

But Mr. Trump is not ‘most people’, he is the Republican nominee to be president.  His better judgment should have forbade him to respond in the way that he did; but it didn’t.  Therein lies the problem: he could not resist!  He could not help but to respond with angry rhetoric!  He has done this kind of thing many times before and all of those Republican politicians who have endorsed him know that this is a major problem for someone who aspires to occupy the Oval Office and yet they tenaciously preserve those endorsements of him.  Why is that?  Why do they do this when they constantly have to repudiate the things that he says and distance themselves from him?

The Gold Star parent who spoke at the Democratic National Convention implored Speaker Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to rebuke Mr. Trump for the many demeaning things that he has said about Muslims, minorities and women and asked that they withdraw their endorsement of him.  So far, they have refused to do so and Mr. Khan said that their refusal to withdraw their endorsements is based strictly on political reasons.  This is likely the answer to the ‘why is that?’ question that was previously asked and, sadly, he is simply stating the obvious.

To be clear, despite the anger and frustration that is gripping our country, Hillary Clinton should be the victor in November.  I hope that she will be because she has a proven track record that says that she is prepared to lead America in these daunting times.  Mr. Trump, on the other hand, has no meaningful record that says that he is capable of leading America and he has yet to reveal any plans as to how he will lead America if he is elected.  The record that he does have is that of a narcissistic braggart and heartless blowhard with a temperament that falls far short of someone who aspires to hold the esteemed office of President of the United States of America.  Which candidate will it be?  The choice is yours, America.

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line

Next, the general election: Full speed ahead

The nomination of Secretary Hillary Clinton to be the Democrats 2016 presidential nominee on Tuesday night July 27th went extremely well; especially after a bad beginning on Monday, which began under the shadow of Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s resignation.  Chairwoman Schultz resigned under pressure as a result of leaked DNC emails that indicated that the DNC was favoring Secretary Clinton over Senator Bernie Sanders.

This further angered Sanders supporters many of whom were already either balking at supporting Secretary Clinton or altogether refusing to support her despite being urged to vote for her by Senator Sanders.  When he personally met with his delegates in an effort to get them to vote for her for the good of the country, he was roundly booed.  Then, on the day that Secretary Clinton was nominated some of the anti Clinton protestors took over a press tent and others got into confrontations with the police.  In some cases these confrontations were physical.

In light of the fact that the nomination of Secretary Clinton was a major history making event, it is likely that those anti Clinton delegates and others who participated in the protests of her nomination will regret their decision to do so.  That is because when it is chronicled for future generations to read about, they will be on the wrong side of this event that they were privileged to be a part of and, therefore, on the infamous side of history.  And if she is elected to the presidency in November, which will be another historical milestone, then that will only exacerbate their bad judgment in choosing to protest her nomination.

The following evening, Wednesday, almost completely brought all of those attending the convention together in unity.  The great majority of those Bernie Sanders supporters who had just the previous day rejected even the idea of a Hillary Clinton nomination settled down and listened while the speakers for the evening laid out numerous reasons as to why all Democrats should unite and support Secretary Clinton.  No one did a better job of making that argument than President Obama.  He delivered a brilliant speech.  By the time that he finished, everyone in the convention center seemed to be convinced that unity was the only answer.

On Thursday night, in accepting the nomination, Secretary Clinton gave a tremendous speech that sealed the deal.  The Democratic convention is now over, Hillary Clinton is the official nominee and the Democrats can now focus on defeating a very dangerous man in the general election who says that he alone can solve America’s problems.  That man is Donald J. Trump.

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line

Senator Bernie Sanders Told The Truth

Back around January this year when Senator Bernie Sanders said that the DNC was not being fair to his campaign but instead was favoring presumptive nominee Hillary Clinton, he told the truth.  I must admit that, at the time, I thought that his complaint was nothing more than a sour grapes response to the fact that he was losing the race.  At the time, I also believed that his complaints about other facets of the DNC – like the rules committee – were just as baseless and should likewise be ignored.

However, with the recent leaks of the DNC emails by WikiLeaks my opinion has changed.  Although I strongly supported Secretary Clinton before these leaks and still do, this is a situation that the Democrats should thoroughly investigate and decide what steps they should take.  When I began writing this article I said that Senator Sanders is justified in calling for DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to resign.  Before I finished it, there was an article in the Washington Post that said she had resigned.  I think highly of Ms. Wasserman Schultz and respect all of the hard work that she has done since she became the Chair but if what these leaked emails suggest about the DNC and their efforts to sabotage the Sanders campaign is true then her resignation was warranted.

Before Ms. Wasserman Schultz resigned, when asked about the emails and how he felt about what they revealed, Senator Sanders said he was not surprised but he was disappointed.  I was both surprised and disappointed.  Again, if what these emails suggest prove to be true, because I – and without doubt many other Democrats hold Ms. Wasserman Schultz in such high esteem and think highly of her leadership of those on the DNC team, I hope that others like former Representative Barney Frank and Donna Brazile who are a part of the DNC were not involved in the effort to undermine Senator Sanders’ campaign.  And I certainly hope that Secretary Clinton is not in any way involved in this fiasco.

For Democrats, this is a terrible time for this information to surface but it needed to be brought out.  It is extremely damaging to the Democratic Party and its efforts to unite Democrats before the start of the general election.  One can only hope that WikiLeaks is neutral, was acting completely above board and is not, itself, favoring either party over the other in the upcoming general election.

There is no doubt that Republican standard bearer Donald Trump and the rest of the Republican Party will eagerly seize this information (the sharks smell blood in the water and are already circling).  Then they will use it to try to drive a wedge between Secretary Clinton’s supporters and Senator Sanders’ supporters to gain an edge in the upcoming general election.  Subsequently, Mr. Trump will use this information to try to persuade as many Democrats as possible, especially Sanders supporters, to join the Trump camp.

There is no doubt that Senator Sanders’ supporters are angry about what has come out in these already leaked emails and there are likely still more angering revelations to come.  Likewise there is no doubt that Clinton supporters are angry because of what has happened in general surrounding these leaked emails and the fact that it has forced Ms. Wasserman Schultz to resign from her position as DNC Chairwoman.

They likely lay a great deal of the blame for this situation at the feet of Senator Sanders because of his constant public complaints, even though they have now proven to be true, about the DNC running an unfair operation and that it was favoring Secretary Clinton.  The operative word in the previous sentence is ‘public’.  Many of them might believe that Senator Sanders is the catalyst that is driving this debacle.  Although his complaints are legitimate and justified, the fact that they were made public is devastating and could prove to be an intricate part of what could hand Donald Trump the presidency.  It could be the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back.

Mr. Trump is dangerous because he is unqualified and unfit to hold the office of President of the United States.  All Democrats should seriously consider this fact before they cast their ballots in November.  Some will likely actually accept his invitation to shift to the Trump camp.  Those who choose this path should be given the benefit of the doubt and we should presume that they chose it because they honestly believe that Mr. Trump is qualified and fit to hold America’s highest office and not because they loathe Hillary Clinton and detest what the DNC did by treating Senator Sanders and his campaign unfairly.

Those who plan to not vote at all or are determined to vote for another candidate should consider that this would be almost as damaging to Secretary Clinton as it would be if they cast their vote for Donald Trump.  They should also consider how America will be impacted if Mr. Trump becomes president.  If after doing this they decide to move forward with their plans then there is likely nothing else that can be said that will change their minds.

Although most Americans probably believe that Donald Trump should never become president, those Democrats mentioned immediately above can be a part of making sure that he does not.  America is in a very precarious situation and Americans must make a decision as to who we really are, if we want to actually be who we really are, or whether we want to become who we appear to be right now.  This will be decided in November and we can determine which of the abovementioned paths we will take through our vote.

Your vote counts.  So whether you are a Democrat, Republican or Independent always remember, your vote is the most important one of all…unless you don’t use it!

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line

Ted Cruz, Republican Senator Gone Rogue

Since the time that Donald Trump declared himself a candidate to be president of the United States, there has been a lot of talk about how bold and unyielding he is.  While there has also been a lot of talk about Senator Ted Cruz since the time that he became a senator, his speech at the Republican National Convention on Wednesday July 20, 2016 proved that he is just as bold and unyielding as Donald Trump.  His speech was unprecedented and will likely command a prominent place in American history books.  Ted Cruz has gone rogue!

In the event that you did not watch his speech or haven’t heard about it, he spoke during prime time at the convention and told delegates there and all of those who were watching the event on television to vote their conscience.  He refused to endorse soon-to-be Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.  He was booed as he left the stage and his wife, Heidi, was escorted from the convention floor amidst those boos for ‘her own safety.’

As I reflected upon what happened I was not completely surprised by what took place because Senator Cruz has conducted himself this way in Washington since he was elected despite the fact that all of his colleagues have grown to despise him.  But still, this move was somewhat unexpected because what he did at the convention versus how he conducts himself in the senate and during interviews increases his risk of damaging his political career exponentially.  As a matter of fact, refusing to endorse the presumptive nominee while on air at the Republican National Convention could actually cost him his political career.

Only he knows for sure whether what he did was a mistake or a calculated risk; and whether he will be rewarded for it or punished remains to be seen.  It is no surprise that those in the Trump campaign opted for the latter but the important response will come from Republicans in general.  His immediate concern will be with how those in his congressional district respond.  Then, if he survives that and still has aspirations to someday become president, he will need to mend fences where required and shore up his relationship with Republicans overall.

To paraphrase Speaker Paul Ryan when he was asked for his thoughts about presumptive nominee Donald Trump, Senator Ted Cruz is not my kind of human being.  But regardless of that, I still have to give him credit.  He is the only Republican among the 16 candidates that ran against Mr. Trump who accused him of being unqualified and unfit to hold the office of President of the United States that did not bow down and kiss his ring after dropping out of the race.  He said that he refused to do so because Mr. Trump made things personal by verbally attacking his father and his wife.  While that might be true – from the start, he did not want to endorse him – and perhaps would not have anyway – but Mr. Trump’s attack on his father and wife provided the perfect cover for him to avoid that endorsement.

Whether Senator Cruz made a mistake by doing what he did at the Republican National Convention or whether he decided to just roll the dice on the chance that he would receive great gains in his political career that he could later use to catapult him into the White House as POTUS at this point, from my perspective, is irrelevant.  What is relevant – again, from my perspective – is that what he did might convince Republicans to reassess whether or not they believe Mr. Trump is fit and qualified to be president before they cast their ballots: and if they reconsider, that there will be enough of them who decide that he is unfit and unqualified to prevent him from winning the general election.

We have had Republican presidents in the past who are good men that have run the country effectively (from Republicans’ point of view) and, to the best of their ability, based on principle and fairness.  They have put aside their personal thoughts and agenda, shunned divisive language and actions and worked to maintain our country’s commitment to unity.  That is not what Mr. Trump is doing.  He built his campaign on divisiveness and has openly spouted hatred and separatism in all forms throughout his primary campaign.  There were enough dog whistles in the language of his 1-hour-plus acceptance speech to satisfy the appetite of all of those who in anyway espouse some form or fashion of divisiveness.

To most Republicans, there were many candidates, in that group of 17 that began the race to become the 2016 Republican nominee who would make an excellent president.  There were two or perhaps even three among them that I would have been comfortable with and I felt could be a good president but Mr. Trump definitely was not in that number.  That is because I got the distinct feeling that he was more interested in pushing people of color back down and having the country stand on their backs in order to reach what he perceives to be its highest heights and achieve what he perceives to be its full potential.  Yes, “make America great again”!  You know, kind of like those ‘good ole days’ that he has lamented having passed America by.

I want a president who truly cares about America and who will represent all of the people.  I want a president who truly cares about America and who will be a voice for all of the people.  I want a president who truly cares about America and who will be the champion for all of the people.  I want a president who truly cares about America, who cares about me and who will represent me.  I want a president with compassion and a heart, one who not just knows the definition of empathy but who is capable of feeling and truly expressing it.  I want a president who is cerebral and has the good judgment to speak in measured words because he is intimately aware of the impact that the words of a person in their position can have.  I want a president that is worthy of holding the office of the President of the United States of America and who is worthy and capable of leading this great country.  I want a president who will make America proud!  That president is not Donald J. Trump.

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line

SNASU: Congress Goes On Vacation

Situation normal all screwed up (SNASU).  Police officers across America continue to kill Black citizens, Black citizens are beginning to kill more police officers, presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump continues to spout words of divisiveness and hate, Republicans who in the past could be depended upon to be statesmen and do the right thing have put away their moral compasses and are supporting him for the sake of party unity despite their terrifying thoughts that if he wins the odds are extremely high that – based on countless examples from his campaign thus far – he could ruin America.  One can only hope that this putting away of moral compasses is just temporary.

On the flip side of the coin, Democrats are still squabbling and complaining about how they do not trust Hillary Clinton so they are struggling with deciding whether or not to vote for her and some of Senator Bernie Sanders’ supporters have even said that they will vote for Donald Trump.  Many Democrats – and likely the great majority of Republicans, are angry because she was not criminally indicted for her email fiasco and so are saying that they will not vote for her.

In the meantime, national polls are showing that these two presumptive nominees are in a virtual tie with regard to who would win the general election if it were held at the time of their polling.  For those who believe what Hillary Clinton has said about Donald Trump, and what Mr. Trump’s 16 Republican opponents said about him before they dropped out of the race to become president; which, was that he is unqualified and unfit to hold the office of President of the United States, that is a scary thought.

While congress continues to be inept at governing, America is becoming more polarized every day and the country is slowly falling apart.  Congress’s solution?  Let’s take a vacation.  They have left Washington and will not return until after Labor Day.  To make things worse, I read an article in Politico recently that said that the Senate was on track to work the fewest number of days in 60 years.  For far too long now, we have been paying our elected officials to do nothing more than vacation from their responsibilities.  The question is, if to vacation is their only job, why do we need them and why do we continue to pay them with tax dollars derived in large part from hardworking everyday Americans?

How can those elected officials who are supposed to be leading us take their responsibility to lead so lightly?  What have things come to in America when our politicians seem to feel that their greatest responsibility to their constituents is to get reelected?  Whatever happened to statesmanship and country first in American politics?

It does no good for an out of work politician like 2016 also ran presidential candidate Jeb Bush to write an op-ed stating that presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump does not represent the future of the country or the GOP, lightly brush over his faults and then, as usual, blame everything that has gone wrong and is continuing to go wrong in America and the world on President Obama and the Democrats.  And just like with Jeb Bush’s op-ed, what former Republican U.S Treasury Secretary and chief executive of Goldman Sacs Henry M. Paulson Jr. penned is almost just as ineffective.  Although he was more open in the article that he wrote about the havoc that Mr. Trump is likely to wreak if he is elected president, says that he will not vote for him and tells his fellow Republicans that it is now time to put country first, he too then goes on to blame President Obama and the Democrats for America’s problems.  The implication in his article is, oh, if we could just get a ‘real’ Republican (anyone other than Donald Trump) into office, America and the world would instantly become better and everything in it would be hunky-dory.

To continue to ignore the deterioration of our country in the hopes that the bad things will eventually go away on their own is ludicrous.  To bury our heads in the sand like this and refuse to acknowledge our faults when it comes to the ugly and despicable parts of American democracy will not fix our problems.  Instead, it has fostered the problems of divisiveness that we are now witnessing in our country.

We are all angry and mainly out of fear are tempted to separate into groups of those who look like us and protect “our” interest.  Rhetoric like that that we are hearing from Donald Trump is meant to stoke those fears.  Mr. Trump knows exactly what he is doing!  He is doing whatever it takes to be elected as president of the United States of America.  It does not matter to him that he is ripping America apart because, as usual, everything is all about Donald Trump.  Even if he does not truly espouse all of the divisive things that he is saying and has no intention of implementing them because he intends to put the country back together again after he is elected, should that happen; it could easily happen that he will find himself left with a “humpty dumpty” situation and America will suffer irreparable damage as a result.

There are far too many of those in America – Democrats and Republicans, those who range from the far left to the far right in their politics, people of all colors and ethnicities and males and females who are reasonable and have always managed to work together in the past to allow anyone to ruin that; especially someone as shallow and whose motives are as obvious as those of Mr. Trump.  I can’t recall which of our elected officials in Washington it was who said it recently but he said that if we decide to move forward with this eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth approach to America’s problems, we will ultimately be a blind and toothless nation.

It is understandable that those of us who do not hold elected office are all angry and frustrated right now but it is imperative that we stop, take a deep breath, regain our composure and attack America’s problems head-on with reasonable and well thought out rationale.  We must expect and demand this of ourselves if we are to demand it from those who hold elected office.  Once we get our own house in order then we can effectively demand the same thing of our elected officials because each of us will be able to effectively use the power of their vote as a means to reward those officials who respond appropriately and punish those who do not.

Your vote counts.  So whether you are a Democrat, Republican or Independent, always remember, your vote is the most important one of all…unless you don’t use it!

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line

Police Are Trying Hard To Meld With Communities

Lately it at least appears that the police in some states around the country are really making an effort to bond with the communities that they protect and serve.  Hopefully, these communities will reciprocate in kind.  There is no doubt that there will continue to be police officers who will reject this effort and continue to abuse their power but like in any job, not everyone will abide by the rules.

We can also rest assured that there will be those in communities around the country who will find reasons, even if they are knowingly fabricated, to reject the efforts of communities to bond with the police because they are driven by anger.  Some are angry because they feel that people of color are raising a fuss and creating turmoil for no real reason because everything is already equal and this so called discrimination against them by the police and other white people is a figment of their imagination.  And people of color are angry at what has been happening to them for decades and the thought that this has been deliberately ignored by our elected officials and others who are in power.

And because those powers that be have patently ignored this situation and continue to wink at it while the lives of numerous people of color have been and continue to be lost, those who comprise these groups feel that something else must be done, even if they haven’t the faintest idea of what that ‘something’ is, before any attempt at reconciliation between police and people of color around America can even begin.

I believe that that ‘something’ for the majority of people of color is validation.  They want white people to openly and sincerely recognize that discrimination against people of color simply because of the color of their skin still exists.  They want them to realize that there is such a thing as white privilege.  They need this validation if they are to be able to move forward and work toward reconciliation.  That notwithstanding, those on the police forces around the country and those in communities throughout America who, for whatever reason, reject efforts at reconciliation must realize that whether or not they intend to be, they are a part of the problem and an obstruction to the solution.

Although the police officers and community members who feel this way may have a valid point and a right to their righteous indignation, this will never be an effective tool in helping to solve this complex problem.  This is not to say that those involved in working to find a solution to it cannot harbor these feelings, but it does say that if they are serious about solving the problem they must be able to move beyond them.

If both sides can move beyond these feelings then a solution can be reached and we can begin to heal.  Although there are no guarantees, if we work together and arrive at a solution the odds are in favor of police officers and community members gaining a better understanding of the complexity of the others situation.  By each side viewing the situation from the others’ perspective we can grow and develop a foundation that assures that each group is and feels mutually respected and appreciated.

There will no doubt still be times when these groups disagree and there will be anger and bickering but it will occur on a completely different level; one which is not driven by the divisiveness of race, raw feelings and that plays out under the shadow of suspicion of the lack of equal justice under the law.  I said in an article that I wrote and posted to this blog on July 13, 2016 entitled ‘All Lives Matter.  They Always Have, Do Now And Always Will’ that I believe that America’s young people will ultimately be the ones who will solve our problems involving race and our country’s policing dilemma.  These thoughts were reinforced by a poem entitled ‘My White Boy Privileges’ that was written by a 14-year-old Caucasian boy and posted to social media, which went viral.

This teenage boy openly acknowledged that he recognized because he is white, he has privileges that people of color do not have.  He said, and I paraphrase here, he would be afraid if he was not on the top rung of the ladder.  He further said that when he sees a policeman, he sees a friend and someone who is there to protect him and he would not trade places with anyone.  There is nothing wrong with him not wanting to trade places with anyone and voicing that sentiment.  What is important is that even while wrapping himself up in that ‘white privilege’, he does not refuse to recognize that not all people have that privilege.

The response to that poem on social media as of the time that I wrote this article represented a microcosm of what is a polarized America when it comes to race and policing in America.  Some people responded with appreciation and understanding and others responded with distain and hatred.  What all white people in America need to understand is that people of color do not want to take that sentiment and privilege away from white people, they simply want to be able to experience that same sentiment themselves by virtue of being afforded that same privilege.  This is not too much to ask and it is something that, against all odds, we can and should work together to do by initiating honest and sincere discourse on America’s problems regarding race and her problems with the policing of American citizens.

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line

All Lives Matter. They Always Have, Do Now And Always Will

Earlier today when I posted this article I asked that Mayor Giuliani think again about the comments he made about “Black Lives Matter” and erroneously asked that he insert the word “Jew” for the word Black in those comments and after doing that if he would still feel the same way.  The word that I intended to use rather than “Jew” was the word “Italian”.  That error has been corrected and I apologize for it . 

I have been writing about the use of excessive and lethal force by the police for a long time now; I have thought about those things even longer.  But for some reason – combined with the recent tragedies in Baton Rouge and Minnesota involving the killings of two Black men by police, when I read about the killings in Dallas of five innocent police officers and the wounding of seven others, I was literally overcome with emotion; so much so that while in the midst of struggling with those emotions I could not help but to wonder how President Obama and all of the other officials who must regularly deal with these types of situations as a representative of all of their constituents are able to make it.  How are they able to do this time-and-time again, maintain their composure, and survive mentally?

Elected officials are saddled with issues that are tough enough to deal with without divisive comments like those coming from past public officials like former Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Representative Joe Walsh.  These men know better than to say something like this because they have been in the shoes of these current elected officials.  No matter how much they might hate President Obama and want to take advantage of an opportunity to play politics, this is not the time for that.  America needs to come together and heal.  The country is in a dangerous place and Americans are in desperate need of leaders who can pull us together not tear us apart!

All of the finger pointing, fighting and taking of sides is, however unfortunate, America’s citizens way – in what is a nightmare-like, schizophrenic way – of crying out for help.  But schizophrenia-like responses is neither what we want nor need from our elected officials especially at this point and under these circumstances!  What we need is combined leadership from all of those whom we have elected to represent us; to represent America!  What makes things even more freighting is that when it comes right down to it, that leadership space currently appears to be a virtual vacuum because there is not a mutual commitment by our elected officials to step up and do the jobs that each was elected to do.  They are without courage.

But please, allow me to get back to Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Representative Joe Walsh.  Mayor Giuliani’s record says that he is a good and reasonable man.  I don’t know that much about former Representative Joe Walsh since he only served one term in congress but I will give him the benefit of the doubt and say that he is likely a good man but one whose opinion, based on his congressional record, obviously differs from mine.  And based on that congressional record, as to whether or not he is a reasonable man, from my perspective, is debatable.  His short record in congress says that he is not so I would not recommend that he be intricately involved in any effort to solve America’s policing problem.

Although I strongly disagree with Mayor Giuliani with regard to the things that he says about Black Lives Matter, I strongly feel that he should be among those who should sit down and work to resolve this problem.  If by some miracle I could have any input at all, my opening comment and question to the mayor would be; “first, think of all of the things that ‘Black Lives Matter’ have done and been involved in and the comments that you have made about that organization as a result of those things.  Then, insert the word Italian for the word ‘Black’ into all of those thoughts and comments.  Would you still feel the same way?

As I have watched and continue to watch things play out among our young people of all colors I believe that they will be the ones who will ultimately resolve this problem.  I do not know if this is because those in my parents’ generation and my generation grew up fighting to be seen as and treated equal and, as a result, gained enough ground so that many of our young people who did not experience that struggle take it for granted that equality is a given so do not even incorporate the lack of it for some into their thinking or if it is because of other factors unknown to me.  But for whatever reason, despite the color of their skin, when any of these young people are treated differently from their counterparts they begin from the starting point of “I am just as good as you are so what is your problem?”  They do this whether they are addressing the police or anyone else.  Unfortunately, this is what gets too many of our young Black men killed by police officers.

This same attitude by young people applies when they are stopped by police officers.  Young people have the audacity to question police officers if they treat them in an unprofessional manner.  And for young people of color – especially young Black men, to do this even when these police officers, treat them differently from the way that they treat their white counterparts seems to quickly escalate these situations.  In situations where white police officers – of which some already fear them simply because of their color – are involved, this has too often proven to evolve into a life or death situation.

If a person of this young generation does not like someone it is more likely than not that it is due to that person’s personality and not because of the color of their skin.  If a person of this generation feels that they are being treated differently from what they perceive to be normal then they are going to question it.  So my question to Mayor Giuliani is; is this something that justifies a police officer killing a Black man or any other person of color?  Should it justify them killing any person despite their color?  And if so, why is it that it is more often a person of color, especially young Black men, who are killed for this rather than a white person?

In the meantime – while we work to solve the policing problem, perhaps our elected officials, their leaders and those who are considered to be among the elites of each party should espouse the examples set by these young people and incorporate lessons learned from them into their way of thinking and governing.  Even if it doesn’t help things it certainly could not hurt them.  And it would also likely do some good for those of us everyday Americans in my parents’ generation and my generation who are not elected officials to have some new light shed on our way of thinking by these young people.  We don’t have to agree with them on everything that they have to say but surely we can agree on some things.

With the situation that America is in now all of us, regular citizens and elected officials, need to focus on that situation and reevaluate what it is that we really feel and truly believe as Americans.  America is a great nation and we can make it even greater.  We just have to be willing to focus and work together.  It will take a lot of hard work but we can do it.

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line

16 Six Twenty-Two: Sneak Peek Short Takes (SPST)

Correction and update:  The word ‘peak’ was inadvertently used instead of the word ‘peek’ in this inaugural SPST article and the article was posted twice.  Those errors have been corrected.  In addition, after giving it further thought, this inaugural SPST will also be the final one.  So, hello and goodbye SPST.

Because the news media cannot place all of the major news stories on the front page, or even the first 10 to 15 pages, they are forced to make a choice as to what news they deem to be most important.  As a result, some very important stories might get buried on pages that are much less likely to be read or not mentioned at all.  That is why most politicians who do not want information that might be damaging to them revealed will dump it on the media as late as possible on a Friday.

And that is why I have decided to commence a new addition to my blog called ‘Sneak Peek Short Takes’ (SPST).  The SPSTs will be a reminder to readers that there is more to the stories in the media like those that regularly imply that Senator Chuck Schumer is an automatic to be the next Senate Minority Leader.  And that “more” might provide a perspective that will cause readers of this blog and those who could have a direct impact on the situation to take pause to assess things more closely before they make their decision.

The SPSTs will not be full-blown blog articles at the time they are posted but, if warranted, will be in the future.  An example of the SPST, which is also the inaugural SPST article, follows.

1)      Senator Chuck Schumer is talked about on a regular basis as the heir apparent to Senator Harry Reid.  Not so fast; should he really be the Senate Minority Leader with the very real possibility that he could become the Majority Leader after the 2016 election?  I am ambivalent.

I suggest that before he is placed in such an important position that his colleagues in the senate take a real close look at him; especially in light of the current political situation.  After all, he is the one who sided with the Republicans against President Obama on the Iran nuclear deal and lobbied other congressional Democrats to vote against it as well.

More to come after this SPST as Senator Reid gets closer to retirement?

2)      Perhaps Secretary Hillary Clinton should take a real close look at Governor John Hickenlooper as her VP running mate.  All things and all potential candidates considered, he could bring an awful lot to the Veepstakes; especially since Senator Sanders has not yet endorsed Secretary Clinton and many of his supporters are threatening to not vote for her and some are even saying that they will vote for Donald Trump.

The stakes are extremely high since even the slightest possibility that Donald Trump could become president is a frightening thought for many Americans.  Under these circumstances Secretary Clinton needs to be sure that she picks a running mate that will optimally compliment her weaknesses.  That candidate is definitely not Senator Corey Booker because she can carry African American votes on her own.  And it is likely not U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Julian Castro because although she is slightly weaker with regard to the Latino vote, she can also carry that group on her own.

Further, she could possibly alienate as many white voters as she would gain Latino voters with a woman and Latino heading the ticket.  This same effect would probably occur with two women heading the ticket; especially if she selects Senator Elizabeth Warren as her running mate because she would likely be considered to be too far to the left as well as too aggressive.

However, even if Senator Warren is not on the ticket she could still be of strong support in helping to assure that the Bernie Sanders supporters would move their support to Secretary Clinton.  She could also provide major help in discouraging disaffected Sanders supporters from voting for Donald Trump.

If Secretary Clinton selected Governor Hickenlooper as her running mate Senator Warren’s efforts combined with Governor Hickenlooper’s ability to attract disaffected Republican voters could become a two-pronged attack.  This two-pronged attack would prevent disaffected Democrats from voting for Mr. Trump while at the same time convincing disaffected Republicans to vote for Secretary Clinton.  More to come after this SPST as we get closer to the general election?

Eulus Dennis – author, Operation Rubik’s Cube and Living Between The Line